A physicist creates an AI algorithm that predicts natural events and may prove the simulation hypothesis.

*Pixellated head simulation. Credit: Adobe Stock*

- Princeton physicist Hong Qin creates an AI algorithm that can predict planetary orbits.
- The scientist partially based his work on the hypothesis which believes reality is a simulation.
- The algorithm is being adapted to predict behavior of plasma and can be used on other natural phenomena.

A scientist devised a computer algorithm which may lead to transformative discoveries in energy and whose very existence raises the likelihood that our reality could actually be a simulation.

The algorithm was created by the physicist Hong Qin, from the U.S. Department of Energyâ€™s (DOE) Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL).

The algorithm employs an AI process called machine learning, which improves its knowledge in an automated way, through experience.

Qin developed this algorithm to predict the orbits of planets in the solar system, training it on data of Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Ceres, and Jupiter orbits. The data is â€śsimilar to what Kepler inherited from Tycho Brahe in 1601,â€ť as Qin writes in his newly-published paper on the subject. From this data, a â€śserving algorithmâ€ť can correctly predict other planetary orbits in the solar system, including parabolic and hyperbolic escaping orbits. Whatâ€™s remarkable, it can do so without having to be told about Newtonâ€™s laws of motion and universal gravitation. It can figure those laws out for itself from the numbers.

Qin is now adapting the algorithm to predict and even control other behaviors, with a current focus on particles of plasma in facilities built for harvesting fusion energy powering the Sun and stars. Along with Eric Palmerduca, a Ph.D. graduate student at PPPL, Qin is using his technique â€śto learning an effective structure-preserving algorithm with long-term stability to simulate the gyrocenter dynamics in magnetic fusion plasmas,â€ť as he elaborated. He also plans to utilize the algorithm to study quantum physics.

*Physicist Hong Qin with images of planetary orbits and computer code. Credit: Elle Starkman*

Qin explained the unusual approach taken by his work:

"Usually in physics, you make observations, create a theory based on those observations, and then use that theory to predict new observations, " said Qin. â€śWhat Iâ€™m doing is replacing this process with a type of black box that can produce accurate predictions without using a traditional theory or law. Essentially, I bypassed all the fundamental ingredients of physics. I go directly from data to data (â€¦) There is no law of physics in the middle.â€ť

Qin was partially inspired by the work of Swedish philosopher Nick Bostrom, whose 2003 paper famously argued that the world we are living in may be an artificial simulation. What Qin believes he has accomplished with his algorithm is provide a working example of an underlying technology that could support the simulation in Bostromâ€™s philosophical argument.

In an email exchange with Big Think, Qin remarked: â€śWhat is the algorithm running on the laptop of the Universe? If such an algorithm exists, I would argue that it should be a simple one defined on the discrete spacetime lattice. The complexity and richness of the Universe come from the enormous memory size and CPU power of the laptop, but the algorithm itself could be simple.â€ť

Certainly, the existence of an algorithm that derives meaningful predictions of natural events from data does not yet mean that we ourselves have the capabilities to simulate existence. Qin believes we are likely â€śmany generationsâ€ť away from being able to carry out such feats.

Qinâ€™s work takes the approach of using â€śdiscrete field theory,â€ť which he thinks is particularly well suited for machine learning, while somewhat difficult for â€śa current humanâ€ť to understand. He explained that â€śa discrete field theory can be viewed as an algorithmic framework with adjustable parameters that can be trained using observational data.â€ť He added that â€śonce trained, the discrete field theory becomes an algorithm of nature that computers can run to predict new observations.â€ť

**Are we living in a simulation? | Bill Nye, Joscha Bach, Donald Hoffman | Big Think**

According to Qin, discrete field theories go against the most popular method of studying physics today, which looks at spacetime as continuous. This approach was started with Isaac Newton, who invented three approaches to describing continuous spacetime, including Newtonâ€™s law of motion, Newtonâ€™s law of gravitation, and calculus.

Qin believes there are serious issues in modern research that stem from the laws of physics in continuous spacetime being expressed through differential equations and continuous field theories. If laws of physics were based on discrete spacetime, as Qin proposes, â€śmany of the difficulties can be overcome.â€ť

If the world works according to discrete field theory, it would look like something out â€śThe Matrix,â€ť made of pixels and data points.

Qinâ€™s work also coincides with the logic of Bostromâ€™s simulation hypothesis and would mean that â€śthe discrete field theories are more fundamental than our current laws of physics in continuous space.â€ť In fact, writes Qin, â€śour offspring must find the discrete field theories more natural than the laws in continuous space used by their ancestors during the 17th-21st centuries.â€ť

Check out Hong Qinâ€™s paper on the subject in Scientific Reports.

Paul Ratner

**Source:** BigThink